Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À¯Ä¡¿ø ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ Resazurin Disc°Ë»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£ ¿äÀο¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE CARIES ACTIVITY BY RESAZURIN DISC METHOD ON CHILDREN

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1996³â 23±Ç 1È£ p.224 ~ 237
¾ç¿µ¼÷, Á¶¼±¾Æ, ÇöÅ¿¬, À̱¤È¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç¿µ¼÷ (  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶¼±¾Æ (  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÇöÅ¿¬ (  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À̱¤È¸ (  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
¼Ò¾ÆÀÇ »çȸ°æÁ¦Àû ¹è°æ¹× °¡Á¤ ±¸°­ À§»ý°ü¸®µîÀÇ »ýÈ°¾ç½ÄÀÌ ±×µéÀÇ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡
´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÒ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÍ»ê½Ã¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇÏ´Â 5°³ À¯Ä¡¿ø°ú 2°³ À¯¾Æ¿ø¾Æ 3-7¼¼Áß ³²¾Æ
179¸í, ¿©¾Æ 153¸íÀÇ 322¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Resazurin Disc¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ È¥ÇÕŸ¾×À» äÃë
ÇÑ ÈÄ, 15ºÐ°£ ü¿Â¿¡¼­ ¹è¾ç½ÃÄÑ ±× ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºµµÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ 5°³ »öä·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ°í ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ±¸
°­°Ë»ç ¶ÇÇÑ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ ±×µéÀÇ ºÎ¸ð¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½ÀÇ °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¿ì½Ä°æÇèµµ¿Í RU°Ë»ç°á°ú °£¿¡´Â »óÈ£ Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀǼº(p<0.05)ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º
°Ë»çÁß RD testÀÇ À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
2. ¼Ò¾ÆÀÇ ¿¬·É¹× ¼ºº°, µ¹º¸¾ÆÁØ »ç¶÷, ÇüÁ¦¼øÀ§, ÀÕ¼ÖÁú Ƚ¼ö ¹× °£½ÄȽ¼ö¿¡ À־´Â °¢
±º °£ÀÇ Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀǼºÀº ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
3. ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ¿¬·É, °¡Á·¼ö, ¾î¸Ó´ÏÀÇ Ã¼°Ý»óÅ¿¡ À־´Â °¢ ±º»çÀÌ¿¡ À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö
¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸³ª ºÎ¸ðÀÇ Çз¿¡ À־´Â ¿ª »ó°ü°è¼öÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ¾ö¸¶ÀÇ Á÷¾÷ À¯¹«¿¡ ÀÖ
¾î¼­´Â Á÷¾÷À» °¡Áø ¾î¸Ó´Ï¿¡¼­ ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºµµ°¡ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀǼºµµ °ü
ÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù (p<0.05).
4. ¾ö¸¶ÀÇ ±¸°­ °Ç°­»óÅ¿¡ À־´Â 5°³±º »çÀÌ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
5. ¼Ò¾ÆÀÇ ¼öÀ¯¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â ¿ìÀ¯º¸´Ù ¸ðÀ¯¸¦ ¸Ô°í ÀÚ¶õ ¾ÆÀÌ¿¡¼­ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºµµ°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸
³µ°í, Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀǼºÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù (p<0.05).
6. ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÀÕ¼ÖÁú Ƚ¼ö¿¡¼­´Â 5°³ ±º°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of socioeconomic backgrounds
and home dental behavior on the caries activity scores by resazurin disc method, 332
preschool children (boys 179, girls 153) in Iksan area were examined for their caries
experience and caries activity. The parents of the children were asked to answer the
questionnaire about socioeconomic backgrounds and home dental behavior.
The sample was divided into five groups according to RD test score.
The relationship between each group and a questionnaire was compared and analyzed.
The following results were obtained.
1. No significant differences was found for child¡¯s age and sex, baby-sitter, sibling
rank and tooth brushing frequency among five groups (p<0.05).
2. A statistical significance was obtained in the relationship between RD test score &
dft rate (p<0.05).
3. No significant difference was found for parent¡¯s age, number of family and mother
s physique among five groups (p<0.05).
Significant difference was found for parent¡¯s education level among five groups
(p<0.05).
4. No significant difference was found for mother's oral hygiene state among five
groups (p>0.05).
5. Children sucking human milk had more high RD test score than those who sucking
bovine milk (p<0.05).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI